Chivas´ broken "promise" rule
Club Deportivo Guadalajara, popularly known as Chivas, has long boasted of their success at the club level by simply pointing to the 11 titles the team has claimed, more than any other Liga MX organization -- until Club America won its 11th title an improbable final versus Cruz Azul in May. In a striking contrast with Las Aguilas, Chivas could not contend for the Clausura 2013 title because they didn’t make the playoffs.
With the added bad news that star signing Aldo de Nigris will be out for two months due to a knee injury at the Confederations Cup in Brazil, it has become clear that Chivas has enough problems to worry about in Liga MX. It doesn´t need to take on the role of worrying about the Mexican national team´s interests.
Yet that seems to be where the storied club is heading, saddling itself with an awkwardly unenforceable mandate that its players must, regardless of their eligibility for other countries, promise to play only for Mexico. In this regard, the team loses sight of the primary mission to find and develop players who will help the squad in the race to be the first to win a dozen titles.
Something both Guadalajara and El Tri share is obvious: Mexican players. Though founded by a Belgian and initially fielding players from a variety of countries, Guadalajara has fielded only Mexican players for more than 100 years. At one point, the standard was so strict that it was specifically required that players be born in Mexico.
This led to the transfer of Gerardo Mascareno in 1998. He was a forward with the club who was actually born in Maryland. However, the American birth of Eduardo Fernández de la Garza, a goalkeeper who helped Chivas win the 1997 championship, was successfully concealed for years. By the time controversy arose over American-born Jesus Padilla in 2008, owner Jorge Vergara had had enough.
Vergara declared that henceforth, Chivas players would use the Mexican constitution to determine eligibility to play for the club -- if a player was born outside of the country to a parent with Mexican citizenship, that would meet the standard, and the club could bring that player into the ranks. This allowed the club to sign not only Padilla, but Mexican-American Miguel Angel Ponce, who has become a key defender.
Ponce has since gone on to a single FIFA competitive call-up by Mexico, so he is now cap-tied to their national team.
Yet the obvious what-if remains. What if Mexico had no need or wish to use Ponce, and he had decided to play for the U.S., the other national team he was once eligible for? That wouldn´t in any way negate his contributions to Guadalajara.
Of course, El Tri has always used players who are not only eligible by birth to a Mexican, but also by naturalization. That’s how Brazilian-born Antonio Naelson, "Zinha", came to play and score for Mexico in the 2006 World Cup.
Basically, despite the branding appeal of being the sole Mexican-only club in Liga MX, there’s an inherent disadvantage in the approach, given every other club can look to sign the best player the organization can afford from anywhere in the world. Since naturalized players are an option, even the Mexican national team has a larger potential pool of players to choose from than Guadalajara.
Another element for Chivas to consider is there is a large number of players who are solid on the club level even though they will never be national team players.
Mexican-American midfielder Eric Avila may be one of these. Avila has shown flashes of potential in his career in the U.S. and while he was coming up in the American youth national team system. Avila could sign for Guadalajara soon and be part of the upcoming Apertura season.
Yet the club has apparently pressured Avila to publicly "resign" from the U.S. national team, though he has never been called in at the senior level. That is unlikely to change. Even more remote is the possibility of a call from El Tri, whose coaches have quite a few excellent midfielders to choose from.
Promising not to play for a national team one is eligible for is a strange and ultimately futile statement to force out of players who just want to perform in the game they love. Even though a public declaration is embarrassing should a player ever change his mind, it´s also not binding by any FIFA-mandated rule. Avila or any other Mexican-American Chivas player not cap-tied by El Tri could always leave Guadalajara and play for the U.S. later if the call came.
Ultimately, Chivas could be hurting themselves the most by this “national-team promise" policy it seems to have added to the original nationality requirement. Juan Pablo Ocegueda, a lively Mexican-American defender on loan to Guadalajara from Tigres since early this year, has not yet appeared for the club. He´s clearly not injured, since he´s a stalwart defender for the U.S. in the U-20 World Cup in Turkey. If his time in a U.S. uniform is the reason he’s not playing for Chivas, then the club is choosing to deprive itself of a player who could be useful in the chase for another title.
Organizations are most effective when following a clearly defined goal. For Club Deportivo Guadalajara, winning needs to be the main focus, not what players might do or not do with their international futures.
Brasil: Flamengo, Vasco, Fluminense, Botafogo (100% Carioca) Rio > Säo Paulo
MENGÃO TRI DA AMÈRICA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RlVt8zJhXQ