Ronaldo, Romario divide underscores Brazil tensions
RIO DE JANEIRO -- "You host a World Cup with stadiums, not hospitals."
It reads like a quote from one of the legion of old men who run football, both in Brazil and globally.
Conceivably it could have been uttered by Sepp Blatter minutes before he hopped aboard a flight to Turkey (oh, the irony) midway through the Confederations Cup, apparently disgusted that the Brazilian people had had the temerity to protest social ills during a FIFA event.
It could have been the cadaverous Jose Maria Marin, clown prince of Brazil´s football association. Such a statement would hardly have been out of place on his rap sheet of previous crimes, the undoubted centerpiece of which was his support for Brazil´s military dictatorship in the 1970s.
It could have been Marin´s predecessor and spiritual leader, Ricardo Teixeira, the man whose promise to fund the World Cup through private investment has never even looked close to being fulfilled.
But the words were uttered by someone who, until recently at least, had a rather higher approval rating among football fans in Brazil. They came from the mouth of Ronaldo, O Fenomeno.
The former Selecao striker made the statement in 2011 during his unveiling as part of the Local Organising Committee (LOC) for World Cup 2014. But if he hoped that the words would be lost to the passage of time he was sorely mistaken; with protests raging over spending on stadiums, video of the press conference began to recirculate on social media websites, generating a fresh wave of ire.
In an attempt to salvage the situation, Ronaldo sought to clarify his position on June 19th. "I may not have expressed myself well, but the editing [of the video] is misleading," he wrote on his official Twitter feed. "The World Cup is a incredible opportunity for Brazil -- a chance to attract attention, tourism and investment. But this doesn´t mean we should ignore important social issues like health, education, transport and security."
In a subsequent interview with Folha de S.Paulo, Ronaldo declared himself in favour of the street demonstrations that have swept through the country in the last fortnight. "The people deserve to be heard," said the 36-year-old. I´m not afraid [of people criticising me] because I am also part of the people. I also want a fairer country. The people aren´t against the World Cup, they´re against corruption."
So far, so good, you might think. But matters soured once more when Ronaldo was quizzed about the staggering cost of stadium construction. "FIFA and the LOC have nothing to do with this. The money doesn´t come from the public purse: it´s not a choice between building a stadium and building a hospital."
But these claims simply don´t ring true. According to sports daily Lance!, 96% of the R$8 billion ($3.6 billion) cost of building and renovating 12 stadiums for the tournament has come from public sources. The total cost of the World Cup now stands at R$28 billion ($12.6 billion) and rising, yet projects that would have had long-term benefits for the country´s population (inter-city train services, better public healthcare) have failed to come to fruition.
These figures -- and the glib soundbites offered by Ronaldo, Blatter et al -- have prompted many to question the logic of Brazil embracing every last one of FIFA´s costly demands. Among the most vocal critics of World Cup spending has been Ronaldo´s former Selecao strike partner Romario, now a well-intentioned member of parliament who represents the state of Rio de Janeiro.
"I supported the bid because it promised to generate employment and income," Romario wrote in The Guardian last week. "[But] investment in cities hosting World Cup matches was prioritised over the people’s needs. I never thought the World Cup would solve all of our problems but now my fear is that this mega event will only deepen those we already have."
Apparently challenged by Romario´s populist stance on the protests, Ronaldo attempted to deflect some attention away from his own PR wrangles ("I see that some people trying to use this situation to their advantage.") but was quickly rebuffed by old Baixinho. "If somebody is trying to make the most of the public indignation, it´s certainly not me," he quipped in an open letter to O Fenomeno.
The former Internazionale forward would do well not to mess with Romario, who isn´t accustomed to suffering fools gladly. A previous dispute with one of Brazil´s most loved footballing icons was put to bed with an aphorism worthy of the best bar room philosophers: "Pele is a poet when he keeps his mouth shut."
(Incidentally, Pele didn´t cover himself in glory over the protests, calling on the Brazilian people to "forget all this confusion" and get behind the Selecao.)
But there is a more fundamental lesson that Ronaldo might draw from all of this. Since he first began to flirt with the administrative side of the game -- first with his sports marketing agency 9ine (in what does the number 9 resemble the letter n?!) and then in meetings with Teixeira and Corinthians/CBF crony Andres Sanchez -- his stock has been on the decline.
He isn´t even the first former Brazil player to have undermined his standing in recent years. Bebeto, like Romario, has turned his hand to politics but has endeared himself rather less to the Brazilian public. Juggling duties at the CBF (unofficial position: Marin´s lapdog) and the 2014 LOC (see previous parentheses), he has shown questionable commitment to his day job as a deputy for Rio, gaining a reputation for absenteeism in legislative sessions.
The moral of the story is clear: A noteworthy playing career can only protect you for so long once you decide to wade through the muddy waters of the game´s political underworld. Unfortunately, it may already be too late for Ronaldo to drag himself to safety.
Brasil: Flamengo, Vasco, Fluminense, Botafogo (100% Carioca) Rio > Säo Paulo
MENGÃO TRI DA AMÈRICA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RlVt8zJhXQ