Mexicans playing in Europe have made no difference in El Tri
MEXICO CITY —- Has the time come? Europe for the "Europeans" and Mexico for the "Mexicans"? The double meaning of the quotation marks should not be missed.
Hugo Sanchez stated: "When we have 40 Mexicans playing in Europe, we can be champions of the world."
Manuel Lapuente said: "Those who play in Europe make no difference to the team. Just because they play better there doesn´t mean to say that they´ll play better with Mexico. There are many factors to be taken into consideration."
As Jorge Luis Pinto, Costa Rica´s coach, said: "Mexico needs remember that when those who play in Europe are stuck in the Estadio Azteca, they´re affected by the altitude and don´t get acclimatized to it in under a week."
These are undeniable facts. Those Mexicans playing in Europe have made no difference to the six-way finals of the Concacaf.
Note that this isn´t through lack of will, but because it requires the full range of footballing skills, emotional, mental and physical.
No one can complain about with Chicharito Hernandez. I reiterate: it´s one thing following Javier on TV, quite another watching him on the field. The range of his personality is impressive.
Against Panama he had a hand in two goals. He made a sweet pass to Oribe Peralta and gave the ball to Fernando Arce, who delivered it to Raul Jimenez so that he could perform a number that could be added to the routines of the Cirque du Soleil.
Javier Hernandez fends off Panama´s Roma Torres. Chicharito missed a penalty and flubbed a pair of easy shots.But Hernandez is now being accused of squandering what was assumed to be his wealth, goals. Against Panama he missed a penalty, misjudged a rebound to force a shot and fanned wildly at another one. Is Javier Hernandez indispensable in El Tri? Should his contrite tears be taken as a pressing excuse? Does Chicharito have a better case when set against the neighborhood bully and goalscorer Oribe Peralta? Or against Jimenez’s majestic bicycle kick?
There´s something else in favor of Hernandez despite all his faults: in the pre-match huddles when the players try to fire themselves up it´s he who talks, shouts and attempts to provide motivation. But what´s the good of him giving his best speech if it´s followed by three blunders like that?
I think he´s the only one who should remain in the squad. Even though the balance or the argument points in another direction when all his blunders and mistakes are taken into consideration.
Giovani? A phrase of Nestor de la Torre in the middle of the World Cup in South Africa comes to mind: "Were still waiting for Calitos Vela (to explode), and we´re now getting tired of waiting for him (to join the team)."
Could the same be true of Giovani? He tried to be the hero against Panama and ended up betraying the team. Balls pleaded for by Layun unmarked on the right. Balls called for by Gullit Pena reaching a shooting position in the center. Defensive walls requested of him by Oribe.
Meanwhile, Gio attempted to raise just a single flag that ended up burnt and in tatters. He tried to erect his own statue and almost demolished that of the entire team.
Is he living off the interest of that magnificent goal he scored in the final of the Gold Cup? I don´t think so. He´s shown that with time and adjustment he can give even more, but does Mexico have that time? Perhaps it does against Costa Rica, because El Tri would have been concentrated for ten days total, but probably not against New Zealand if it eventually reaches the playoff.
And Javier Aquino? It´s not true that he´s been ruined by moving him out of position. He had a magnificent scoring opportunity and wasted it. His passes were once again a gift to Panama´s solid defense, that only slipped up, possibly as a result of tiredness, when it allowed Jimenez a perfect gambolling run. It´s not that Aquino is unfamiliar with that position, only that he lacks calmness and composure, and he still needs to lift his head at the right moment in order to establish the destination of the pass and not just see where it landed.
To reiterate, it’s not a matter of his zeal or commitment; he passes with skill, conviction and brotherly generosity to a team of desperados.
The case of Guillermo Ochoa is also worth looking at in this respect. Is he slow in reacting? The play containing the pass to Tejada was precise, exact, well-timed and with plenty of space, but painfully obvious. True, the ball went in thanks to a scrappy fluke, but hand-to-hand combat has always been one of Memo´s strengths.
So I´m going to make this point in advance. I´m making it prior to the game against Costa Rica, during which all the Europeans, particularly Gio and Hernandez, will no doubt show a marked improvement.
That’s why I´d like to back up a conviction I´ve had for many years: in El Tri, and in the short periods involved in the qualifying rounds, especially in the first games of these series of double matches, we should stick with domestic players, with those who play in Mexico, and not consider assembling a team around three or four European players.
Therefore, when one talks of hierarchies, one can’t help wondering whether it’s a greater honor to face Costa Rica, for example, than it is to be a permanent selection for Manchester United or to engage in the outrageous insolence of a Jimenez under pressure, when things are at their most tense, when the world of failure and opprobrium may be about to crash down on one´s head, and still deliver with that insolent faith in oneself, that bicycle-kick goal.
That´s why a coach´s job is so difficult: they have to decide between what they think of their players, what they expect from their players, and the slaps and caresses that those same players end up giving them at key moments.
Footballers are not cars that are purchased from a catalog under guarantee. They´re human, and that´s why the coach, in this case Victor Manuel Vucetich, must make a superhuman effort to differentiate between his beliefs, his faith and manifest facts, those that are demonstrably true.
What about you? Do you think the moment has come? Europe for the "Europeans" and Mexico for the "Mexicans"? Without, of course, failing to miss the double meaning of the quotation marks.
MEXICO CITY —- Has the time come? Europe for the "Europeans" and Mexico for the "Mexicans"? The double meaning of the quotation marks should not be missed.
Hugo Sanchez stated: "When we have 40 Mexicans playing in Europe, we can be champions of the world."
Manuel Lapuente said: "Those who play in Europe make no difference to the team. Just because they play better there doesn´t mean to say that they´ll play better with Mexico. There are many factors to be taken into consideration."
As Jorge Luis Pinto, Costa Rica´s coach, said: "Mexico needs remember that when those who play in Europe are stuck in the Estadio Azteca, they´re affected by the altitude and don´t get acclimatized to it in under a week."
These are undeniable facts. Those Mexicans playing in Europe have made no difference to the six-way finals of the Concacaf.
Note that this isn´t through lack of will, but because it requires the full range of footballing skills, emotional, mental and physical.
No one can complain about with Chicharito Hernandez. I reiterate: it´s one thing following Javier on TV, quite another watching him on the field. The range of his personality is impressive.
Against Panama he had a hand in two goals. He made a sweet pass to Oribe Peralta and gave the ball to Fernando Arce, who delivered it to Raul Jimenez so that he could perform a number that could be added to the routines of the Cirque du Soleil.
Javier Hernandez fends off Panama´s Roma Torres. Chicharito missed a penalty and flubbed a pair of easy shots.But Hernandez is now being accused of squandering what was assumed to be his wealth, goals. Against Panama he missed a penalty, misjudged a rebound to force a shot and fanned wildly at another one. Is Javier Hernandez indispensable in El Tri? Should his contrite tears be taken as a pressing excuse? Does Chicharito have a better case when set against the neighborhood bully and goalscorer Oribe Peralta? Or against Jimenez’s majestic bicycle kick?
There´s something else in favor of Hernandez despite all his faults: in the pre-match huddles when the players try to fire themselves up it´s he who talks, shouts and attempts to provide motivation. But what´s the good of him giving his best speech if it´s followed by three blunders like that?
I think he´s the only one who should remain in the squad. Even though the balance or the argument points in another direction when all his blunders and mistakes are taken into consideration.
Giovani? A phrase of Nestor de la Torre in the middle of the World Cup in South Africa comes to mind: "Were still waiting for Calitos Vela (to explode), and we´re now getting tired of waiting for him (to join the team)."
Could the same be true of Giovani? He tried to be the hero against Panama and ended up betraying the team. Balls pleaded for by Layun unmarked on the right. Balls called for by Gullit Pena reaching a shooting position in the center. Defensive walls requested of him by Oribe.
Meanwhile, Gio attempted to raise just a single flag that ended up burnt and in tatters. He tried to erect his own statue and almost demolished that of the entire team.
Is he living off the interest of that magnificent goal he scored in the final of the Gold Cup? I don´t think so. He´s shown that with time and adjustment he can give even more, but does Mexico have that time? Perhaps it does against Costa Rica, because El Tri would have been concentrated for ten days total, but probably not against New Zealand if it eventually reaches the playoff.
And Javier Aquino? It´s not true that he´s been ruined by moving him out of position. He had a magnificent scoring opportunity and wasted it. His passes were once again a gift to Panama´s solid defense, that only slipped up, possibly as a result of tiredness, when it allowed Jimenez a perfect gambolling run. It´s not that Aquino is unfamiliar with that position, only that he lacks calmness and composure, and he still needs to lift his head at the right moment in order to establish the destination of the pass and not just see where it landed.
To reiterate, it’s not a matter of his zeal or commitment; he passes with skill, conviction and brotherly generosity to a team of desperados.
The case of Guillermo Ochoa is also worth looking at in this respect. Is he slow in reacting? The play containing the pass to Tejada was precise, exact, well-timed and with plenty of space, but painfully obvious. True, the ball went in thanks to a scrappy fluke, but hand-to-hand combat has always been one of Memo´s strengths.
So I´m going to make this point in advance. I´m making it prior to the game against Costa Rica, during which all the Europeans, particularly Gio and Hernandez, will no doubt show a marked improvement.
That’s why I´d like to back up a conviction I´ve had for many years: in El Tri, and in the short periods involved in the qualifying rounds, especially in the first games of these series of double matches, we should stick with domestic players, with those who play in Mexico, and not consider assembling a team around three or four European players.
Therefore, when one talks of hierarchies, one can’t help wondering whether it’s a greater honor to face Costa Rica, for example, than it is to be a permanent selection for Manchester United or to engage in the outrageous insolence of a Jimenez under pressure, when things are at their most tense, when the world of failure and opprobrium may be about to crash down on one´s head, and still deliver with that insolent faith in oneself, that bicycle-kick goal.
That´s why a coach´s job is so difficult: they have to decide between what they think of their players, what they expect from their players, and the slaps and caresses that those same players end up giving them at key moments.
Footballers are not cars that are purchased from a catalog under guarantee. They´re human, and that´s why the coach, in this case Victor Manuel Vucetich, must make a superhuman effort to differentiate between his beliefs, his faith and manifest facts, those that are demonstrably true.
What about you? Do you think the moment has come? Europe for the "Europeans" and Mexico for the "Mexicans"? Without, of course, failing to miss the double meaning of the quotation marks.
Brasil: Flamengo, Vasco, Fluminense, Botafogo (100% Carioca) Rio > Säo Paulo
MENGÃO TRI DA AMÈRICA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RlVt8zJhXQ