River, Boca and Racing’s Past Masters Falter in Modern Football
It is the eternal debate within the world of football. When it comes to choosing a new coach – an event that in Argentina can often occur more often than changing the insipid hamburgers on sale inside stadiums – who is the best bet: the young, inexperienced buck who is untested but comes with new ideas? Or do you side with the old hand, who has been there and done everything?
Three of the country’s biggest clubs, Boca Juniors, River Plate and Racing Club, opted for the latter when picking their current trainers, all bringing back former legends to the hotseats. And in each of the institutions, the decision is looking less than inspired.
The case of Racing, rock bottom of the Final table and on course for a second consecutive disastrous season, is most telling. Reinaldo ‘Mostaza’ Merlo was ushered in towards the end of 2013 at a time of crisis, to direct a side that had already lost 11 of their 13 games in the Inicial. By insisting on limited, safety-first football Merlo steadied the ship, finishing the year on a winning note and creating optimism for the coming campaign.
What followed, however, was more of the same. Unable or unwilling to alter the uninspiring football seen in Avellaneda, Mostaza failed to foresee that teams would figure out what made Racing click after his assumption. But that was exactly what happened.
After starting strongly with a 3-0 win over Colón, six of the last seven matches have ended in defeat for La Academia. Rivals noted gleefully that the weaknesses of 2013 – frailty down the wings, the lack of a natural goalscorer, precious little urgency or creativity in midfield – had not been corrected, and took advantage with a series of reverses that have left Merlo on the brink at the club he took to the 2001 Apertura championship. What has happened is a prime example of how the stubborness of age left the coach open to smarter, more on-the-ball opposition.
Boca, directed by turn of the millennium great Carlos Bianchi, and Ramón Díaz’s River are not in quite such dire straits, although a mediocre mid-table standing is not acceptable for either of the two sides who by far command the biggest fan-bases and budgets in Argentina. But the same accusations can apply. The pair appear unable to control their players, either off or on the pitch, and are stuck using the same methods that made them successful over a decade ago.
Bianchi’s recent press conference alongside squad talisman Juan Román Riquelme was telling. Responding to reports of a training-ground scuffle between Agustín Orión and Pablo Ledesma told a sad story. It was the player who took the microphone, telling reporters that a media blackout was now in place around the Bombonera. One of the most trophy-laden coaches in Argentine history was reduced to remaining mute alongside his charge, like a doddering grandfather forced to sit in on a meeting because it was too hot to leave him outside in the car.
Many believe that as well as outdated methods, the generational gap is too gaping for coaches of advanced years to understand their young tearaways. Maybe they have a point. At 64-years-old, Bianchi is no less than 45 years the senior of teenage sensation Luciano Acosta.
The majority of Racing’s first-team were in primary school when Merlo took that side to victory amid the debt meltdown and unrest of 2001; while Díaz’s Copa Libertadores triumph of 1996 occurred when stars such as Giovanni Simeone, Matías Kranevitter and Eder Álvarez Balanta were still toddlers.
In contrast, the coaches of joint-leaders in the Final, Colón and Estudiantes, have one thing in common. Diego Osella and Mauricio Pellegrino are both closer to 40 than 50, and have turned round previously struggling clubs to reach the top. The example of three of Argentina’s current top performers, called ‘model’ institutions due to a relative coherency on the field and in the boardroom, is also telling.
When choosing their latest coaches, the ‘model clubs’ all plumped for young hopefuls with no prior experience in the top role. Guillermo Barros Schelotto (40) has worked wonders at Lanús, turning him into the heir-elect at Boca and lifting the Copa Sudamericana at the end of 2013. Newell’s’ Alfredo Berti had been Gerardo Martino’s assistant beforehand, but took over the reins serenely at the age of 41 to guide the Lepra to a second-placed finish last December; José ‘Turu’ Flores, 42, is making a similarly decent first impression with Vélez.
The gulf between old and new was demonstrated perfectly at the weekend, when Berti’s Newell’s dismantled Racing in a 2-0 victory. In football terms, it was a little like watching an HD-ready 3D LCD spectacular steadily overcome a throwback from the black-and-white era.
So has the day of the dinosaurs passed? Perhaps. But the issue goes far deeper than our trio of old heads failing to make an impression in the digital age. Their failure is also an indictment of the conservatism that runs to the foundations of the five clubs which label themselves Los Grandes (Independiente and San Lorenzo complete the quintet).
Looking back to past glories is merely a symptom of the mismanagement and lack of forward-thinking which has forced these great clubs to become also-rans in the Argentine football hierachy. They may still dominate the headlines, and pack out the stands; but when it comes to their record on the pitch, these past masters have been left in the dust by the new kids on the block and their more dynamic management.
Brasil: Flamengo, Vasco, Fluminense, Botafogo (100% Carioca) Rio > Säo Paulo
MENGÃO TRI DA AMÈRICA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RlVt8zJhXQ