Snak

Broja og Gallagher er jo virkelig PL-profiler i denne sæson.

Livramento er vel også en for fremtiden hos jer?
Og har I ikke fortsat store (realistiske) forhåbninger til Billy Gilmour?

Hvem har jeg glemt af de mest åbenlyse?

Et er at spile for Saints og CP andet er Chelsea.

Men de skal selvfølgelig have chancen. Men de skal samtidig være klar over at man ikke spiller hvergang i Chelsea. Truppen er bred og der skal spilles mange kampe.

Gilmour er jeg dog lidt usikker på.

Er helt med på forskellen i klubstatus, dagligt pres og generel konkurrence (Saints og CP vs. Chelsea).

Det ændrer dog ikke på, at de nævnte spillere på hver sin måde har leveret på meget højt niveau.
I en tid hvor risikable punts (ikke PL-proven) rask væk koster 20-30 mio. pund, må det være sund fornuft at prøve dem af.
Ellers laver I vel bare en "Tammy" eller "Tomori" transfer.

Hvorfor er forventningerne til Gilmour reduceret?
Det er jo vanvittigt svært at skulle levere ekstraordinært i en klub uden bare een eneste semi-god PL-spiller.

Livramento er desværre solgt men kan købes tilbage på klausul til 25mil.

"Regrets? It would have been nice to play a game but I had to think what was best for me," he said when asked if he regretted leaving Chelsea before representing the first team. "Being young I´ve always wanted to just play first team football as soon as possible.

"I feel like if I stayed there things wouldn´t have happened as quickly as now. It was a hard decision for everyone involved. They agreed that it was best for me as well and they´ve always looked after me.

"I´ll never have a bad word to say about how Chelsea treated me growing up and developing me into the player I am today. It´s probably the best academy in the world that anyone would want to go to and develop."

@Vince

Når Abramovich er væk er Marina også.

Og så er Wise også væk…

Jeg går med Roman …

Så havde du nok haft et andet brugernavn? Crespo eller Veron eller noget…

Okay okay - så bliver jeg og prikker til dig i ny og næ ;)

Nej tak til Hansjörg Wyss! Han skal ikke i nærheden af klubben.

@Nicola Imfeld

Some background on Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss for my British friends. He certainly likes sports but has not had a great affinity for football. The fact that he could now be involved in a takeover of Chelsea comes as something of a surprise.

On the other hand, Mr. Wyss is a true westerner by heart. If it would be on him, neutral Switzerland would position itself even more clear in the political West. I think that plays a real role here. Wyss is driven by ideology. He sees Russian oligarch Abramovich with apparent contacts to Putin, who is currently waging a war in Ukraine. Having the chance now to rid Chelsea of such a person, for whom Wyss doesn´t have much respect, drives him. What does this mean for Chelsea?

Wyss is in this aspect a typical Swiss. Cautious, humble, acting with prudence. He won’t see Chelsea as his toy & open his wallet. It’s certainly not in the identity of Wyss to „buy“ the Champions League. Keep in mind though that it‘s not him alone bidding for Chelsea.

... og så er han 86 år gammel, og står velsagtens med det ene ben i graven.