Copy/paste fra Bluekipper
I would like to set out how much our club is badly financially ran.
1. Everton´s net spend since the Prem began is £55M 1992-2011; in the same period, we have sold £48.2M of youth players, meaning the club have spent just £6.8M of the money outside of youth players sales.
2. On the Official site we have 30 1st team players listed, 15 of which cost nothing, 7 cost £3M or less, 3 cost £5M or less and 5 cost more than £5M, given that Yakubu is one of the last 5, is out on loan, this now means over half of our squad cost nothing.
3. In 1998, before Sky and Premier League windfalls plus shirt sponsorships, Everton broke the transfer record for £2.2M (Cottee) yet, 23 years later, 20 out of our 30 squad of players cost less to buy than Cottee, and the club tells us we can´t afford a loan player!!
4. Our net spend is the 11th highest in Prem, yet we are only one of 7 clubs to play in every Prem season.
5. Villa and Spurs are similar clubs & gates to us yet Villa have spent £60M net and Spurs £140M net more than us.
6. Wages? you ask... No, we are only 10th in the wages league.
7. Moyes has spent £106M but sold £81M, net £25M over 9 seasons, less than £3M per year. 10 managers have spent more than Moyes despite only Ferguson and Wenger being in their posts longer than Moyes.
8. Other possible explanations for the missing money: the ground? One stand rebuilt since the Prem started, and even that was cut in half, supposed to be two-tier.
9. In the last 3 years, here are some of the net spends of clubs over that period: Stoke £44M (£0M debt apparently despite that outlay); WBA £19.25M; Wolves £21.65M; Hull £13.9M; Fulham £12.3M; Birmingham £29.5M... also outspent by Sunderland until the Bent transfer — what is Everton´s spend over the same period? £5M!!
10. Other revenues acquired recently which have vanished: Chang £12M; Bellefield £8M; Kitbag £5M.
Summing up, despite being 1 of only 7 clubs to play in all Prem seasons, despite only spending £6.8M in 19 years outside of youth player sales, despite turnover that was £47M in 2006 but has hovered around £80M since, despite most of our time in Prem having the smallest squad, despite being only 10th in the wages league, despite being only 11th in net spend on transfers, despite having fairly steady around 35k gates in Prem, Bill Kenwright tells the fans we cannot afford a loan player or spend an amount we broke the transfer record with (£2.2M) on a player, 23 years later...
You, sir, are having a laugh, at our bloody expense, mate. Money is going astray in the bucket loads and you, BK, are responsible either directly or indirectly. In my opinion, BK is a stooge (see Alan Ball´s book for that) and is DESTROYING OUR CLUB.
People´s Club? Again you´re having a laugh at our expense... you (BK) wouldn´t even answer a Shareholders genuine question, you won´t even allow an AGM or EGM... do us all a favour mate: your game is up — RESIGN NOW.
Thomas Williams, Kissimmee Posted 30/01/2011 at 01:59:03
- - - - - - - - - - -
Er det rystende dårlig ledelse, eller viser BK en Forudseenhed og er klar til at Løn/signing´s boblen springer ??
NIL SATIS NISI OPTIMUM