Zug
Men så er enten agenten eller Caicedo jo utroværdige og utilregnelige. Så er det da bare med at trække tilbuddet tilbage
Men så er enten agenten eller Caicedo jo utroværdige og utilregnelige. Så er det da bare med at trække tilbuddet tilbage
Everyone knew about Moisés Caicedo in 2021. The reason Brighton got him was because only they could figure out exactly who his agent was.
Just to expand on this a little, because who has the time to read stuff these days: when Caicedo was at his first club, Independiente, he was swamped with offers from agents. There were at least half a dozen who claimed to represent him, or to be due a cut of whatever deal.
Independiente are a really well-run club, possibly the best-run in South America, but it made it almost impossible for European teams to work out who they had to agree terms with. Every time they thought they had, someone else would appear.
Caicedo left Kancha in January, around the time he was trying to move to Arsenal. And then Chelsea. He´s now with some people called Fútbol Division. But, interestingly, Kancha launched a legal case* against Caicedo for breach of contract.
*It´s not entirely clear whether they did this when he left them for his new agency, or previously. Manuel Sierra, Fútbol Division´s CEO, has said the case dated back to when he left Independiente. Sierra´s said more than once he has "good relations" with Kancha.
All of which is to say: Caicedo´s representation situation has always been insanely messy and it would be a good working assumption for journalists not to presume they are being briefed in good faith; and what the player himself wants may not be the only consideration.