Snak

Man kan også argumentere for andet muligt og umuligt Acheron, det gør det dog ikke rigtigt. Jeg tror ikke VAR-dommeren på 10 sekunder var igennem alle mulige hypoteser.

Hvis dette er de nye regler kan jeg ikke se der skulle være frispark:

Deliberate handball remains an offense. The following ´handball´ situations, even if accidental, will be a free kick:

The ball goes into the goal after touching an attacking player´s hand/arm

A player gains control/possession of the ball after it has touches their hand/arm and then scores, or creates a goal-scoring opportunity

The ball touches a player´s hand/arm which has made their body unnaturally bigger

The ball touches a player´s hand/arm when it is above their shoulder (unless the player has deliberately played the ball which then touches their hand/arm)

s://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/11777969/var-in-the-premier-league-the-ultimate-qa

VAR kommer til PL.

Her er en opsummering. Særligt spændende er det med hands reglen, hvor der er blevet lavet mere rene linjer

Deliberate handball remains a foul, but a free kick will be awarded in the following scenarios, even if accidental:

- The ball goes into the goal after touching an attacking player´s hand or arm

- A player gains control/possession of the ball after it touches their hand/arm and then scores, or creates a goal-scoring opportunity

- A ball touches a player´s hand/arm which has made their body unnaturally bigger

- The ball touches a player´s hand/arm when it is above their shoulder (unless the player has deliberately played the ball which then touches their hand/arm)


However, the following will not usually be a free kick unless they are one of the above situations:

- The ball touches a player´s hand/arm directly from their own head/body/foot or the head/body/foot of another player who is close/near

- The ball touches a player´s hand/arm which is close to their body and has not made their body unnaturally bigger

- A player is falling and the ball touches their hand/arm when it is between their body and the ground to support the body (but not extended to make the body bigger)


Repost

Man kan også argumentere for andet muligt og umuligt Acheron, det gør det dog ikke rigtigt. Jeg tror ikke VAR-dommeren på 10 sekunder var igennem alle mulige hypoteser.

Enig. I artikeltråden skrives der dog, at der ikke kan dømmes mål hvis det angribende hold har haft arm/hånd på bolden som en del af opspillet. I så fald giver kendelsen mere mening, om end reglen er håbløs.

@Sir_Cumsized

A player gains control/possession of the ball after it has touches their hand/arm and then scores, or creates a goal-scoring opportunity.

Den er da opfyldt, da den skaber en målchance.

tjek reglerne herover. Den scorende spiller havde da heller ikke hånd på.

"A player gains control/possession of the ball after it has touches their hand/arm and then scores, or creates a goal-scoring opportunity."

Han opnår jo ikke possesion.

Der står "Or creates a goal scoring opportunity" til sidst.

or creates a goalscoring opportunity. Det sker jo da bolden ændrer retning.

Men der står jo at man skal have possesion?

A player gains control/possession of the ball after it has touches their hand/arm and then scores, or creates a goal-scoring opportunity.


Så man opnår kontrol og DEREFTER enten scorer eller skaber en målchance?

Bare VAR er konsekvent med den slags kendelser.