Snak

Cunha virker som et fremragende køb.

Lignede det ikke en klokkeklart straffe?

Saliba træder direkte ned på anklen/hælen på Cunha fuldstændig uden at ramme bolden

Jeg undrer mig over, at den ikke blev tjekket.

https://x.com/thebrunology/status/1957133711289565543?s=46&t=v8E64dXyL7xF9xi2o0IlBQ

Den blev da forhåbentligt tjekket af VAR for mere oplagt situation findes næsten ikke at tjekke igennem. Det er ikke meget bold han rammer og dommeren har nok svært ved at se det med så mange i boksen.

I 9 ud af 10 gange vil den give straffespark, men dommeren havde lagt en linje hvor nærmest intet gav frispark, og det må være den VAR går med, tænker jeg
En underholdende kamp og hvor er Cunha en fed fodboldspiller

I 9 ud af 10 gange vil den give straffespark, men dommeren havde lagt en linje hvor nærmest intet gav frispark, og det må være den VAR går med, tænker jeg

Det håber jeg også var beslutningen for den var aldrig blevet tilbagedømt hvis dommeren havde set forseelsen i første omgang.

Den blev som sagt forhåbentligt tjekket igennem og så må man acceptere beslutningen.

Og så er der vel bare større og større tendens til at de lader alle tvivlstilfælde ligge og den / fejlen skal være klokkeklar for at de blander sig.

“ Og så er der vel bare større og større tendens til at de lader alle tvivlstilfælde ligge og den / fejlen skal være klokkeklar for at de blander sig. “

Det hedder jo også Clear & obvius.

Dale Johnsons VAR review er kommet - 3 nedslag fra artiklen.

Chelsea - CP:
Verdict: You can´t say this was a wrong decision, because at the point the free kick was struck Palace defender Marc Guéhi had pushed Moisés Caicedo across and into the wall. There can be no doubt that Guéhi was within one metre of the wall, and the law says that´s an offence.

What you can question is whether the VAR should be getting involved. After all, it´s not like an attacker hasn´t been within one metre of a wall on a free kick in the last six years.

In January on this very ground, AFC Bournemouth boss Andoni Iraola was furious that a late Chelsea free kick, which earned the home side a 2-2 draw, wasn´t ruled out. Marc Cucurella moved into Antoine Semenyo on the end of the Bournemouth wall, but the goal stood.

Cucurella´s actions didn´t impact the goal, as Reece James curled a shot low into the opposite corner. Yet you could argue that Caicedo wasn´t part of the wall which was originally set up.

Liverpool - Bournemouth
Verdict: The incident was cleared too quickly, with Oliver only considering the first touch of the arm. This was clearly wrong as Senesi then deliberately knocked the ball from Ekitike´s run.

DOGSO on the halfway line is rare, but not unknown: Arsenal´s Myles Lewis-Skelly was sent off against West Ham United last season through as VAR intervention. Senesi should have been shown the red card; only Liverpool´s two late goals to secure the win prevented this being a bigger talking point.

There would be a question about a possible covering defender, but no more than that. There should have been a VAR intervention as the clear likelihood is Ekitike would take control of the ball and be in on goal.

Across 15 VAR appointments and 35 key match incidents last season, Oliver only had one mistake -- though it was a big one: West Ham´s late penalty which gave them a 2-1 win over Manchester United.

United - Arsenal
VAR review: It´s an incident which has split opinion, and will depend how you look at the way the too players are moving.

Saliba´s challenge appeared to be more of a blocking action rather than into the opponent, while Cunha was moving backwards.

Yet it was Cunha who was taking possession of the ball, and he could have had the opportunity to control and turn if Saliba hadn´t made the contact and caused the attacker to go down.

Verdict: It´s a challenge which is open to interpretation, and it was quickly cleared by the VAR. It´s one of those incidents which needs to be given by the referee -- and whatever he has decided on the field would be supported.

Jeg forstår ikke helt fortolkningselementet i den sidste situation. I hvilken situation er det en lovlig blokering at sætte foden ud foran en angribende spiller og fælde manden uden at ramme bolden?

Uanset om jeg sætter en tackling ind og misser bolden eller om jeg sætter en fod foran ham et splitsekund før han ankommer og bliver ramt (og “blokerer”, fremfor “tackler), så er det da et ulovligt indgreb der skal give frispark, og i dette tilfælde straffespark.