If the referee plays the advantage following an offence that would have resulted in a red or yellow card being shown, the card must be shown the next time the game stops. However:
if the offence was denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity, a yellow card is shown instead of a red card, as playing the advantage allowed the attack to continue
if the offence was stopping or interfering with a promising attack, no card is shown as playing the advantage allowed the attack to continue
Jeg var faktisk ikke klar over at hvis dommeren dømmer fordel og angrebet fortsætter så skal han kun give gult for stoppe en klar scorings mulighed istedet for rødt. Og hvis den var til gult skal der slet ikke gives kort hvis der dømmes fordel.
Unless there is a clear goal-scoring opportunity for the non-offending team, the referee should not play the advantage following red-card offences, particularly those involving serious foul play or violent conduct, or offences that require a second
yellow card.
I forhold til Bergvall situationen mod Liverpool, så står der dog også at dommeren ikke skal dømme fordel i tilfælde af et andet gult kort eller direkte rødt. Så på den måde frikender det ikke Bergvall i den situation.
Fejlen fra dommeren var at han dømte fordel, han burde istedet have dømt frispark til Liverpool og givet Bergvall sit andet gule kort, men det er åbenbart korrekt ikke at give gult efter der er dømt fordel.