I would switch to 433 vs England. 352 they will kill us, especially if we play Vestergaard. Love him, but he is too slow, Saka will destroy him.
It is a conundrum.
I would argue that neither Andersen or Vestergaard are well suited for playing wide in a back three, as they lack the dynamism required, but the formation have resulted in the best performance of the post Qatar period and we lack better alternatives, though Kristensen wasn´t half bad and Kristiansen does have the height. Probably not the right time for that kind of experimentation.
Alternatively, you could move Vestergaard to the center and play Christensen on the left, but it isn´t his best position.
4-3-3 is undoubtedly Hjulmands preferred formation, but according to him, he doesn´t have the players required and lately the results, at least, support that.
I imagine we will see some kind of change in formation at some point.
I thought it might have been a good move after the equalizer, though it could as well have caused too much confusion and turned a draw into a defeat.
We will never know.
Personally I think a backline of Kristiansen, Christensen, Andersen and Bah seems solid.
It creates more space for Andersens fænomenal long balls and neither Bah or Kristiansen actually play wingbacks in Benfica and Bologna.
We lack good one-on-one players, but we do have speedy wingers in Bruun Larsen and Skov Olsen, so on paper, I don´t see why we couldn´t play some version of a 4-3-3.
Hjulmand and Højbjerg behind Eriksen and Bruun Larsen, Højlund and Skov Olsen up front.