Snak

Plantagen overvåges og mere fra samme skuffe de kommende år.

Link fra manges yndlings source.

http://www.huffingtonpos…466400.html

Ps, iøvrigt sjovt som denne FBI director igen har problemer med sine svar, som forleden under IRS høringen, hvor han ikke vidste hvem der ledede efterforskningen.

Her er han ikke sikker om Programmet har aftaler med DOJ eller Homeland Security.

Og nu jeg havde forvildet mig ind på dette medie, så faldt jeg over denne artikel skrevet af en Mr Howard Fineman, som tilsyneladende er Editorial Director of the AOL Huffington Post Media Group. Og ofte kommer på besøg hos Chris Matthews og Rachel Maddow, oplysninger jeg først faldt over EFTER at have læst hans kronik og jeg blev ikke overrasket over hans valg af "venner".

Han er jo helt væk i sin vinkel på historien, men måske er det vanlig standard fra dette medie?

Hvis Latinoer er for:

""Latinos support a strong government role in the economy, a U.N.-based foreign policy, socialized medicine, public education, generous social and welfare programs," Bendixen told me. "They are probably the most left-wing constituency in our electorate. It´s a tough challenge for the GOP to connect."

Tja, så er de jo "tabte" stemmer anyway og ikke nogen der skal bejles til OVERHOVEDET.

Så hvorfor skulle disse "latino-kandidater" bukke sig i støvet for dem for at blive valgt, og sige god for statsborgerskab til illegale indvandere? Blot fordi de selv er af latinoafstamning?

Ville det ikke være en bedre strategi de netop bruger deres egen herkomst til at bevise det deres forældre, og lovlige immigrater netop HAR vist den amerikanske drøm stadig er en mulighed??

Taber de så valget har de stadig æren i behold og ikke solgt deres sjæl til kriminelle.

Ps, og Lindsay Graham viser endnu engang han burde skifte parti.

Altid noget ikke alle Huff Post læsere er som skribenten.

""Why can´t anyone admit what this is all about. This has nothing to do with immigration. All this has to do with democrats wanting more uninformed voters that will be poor and dependent on government.
If you work your way up and are successful, the democrats would have you believe that you got there with the governments help or by crushing some one else´s dreams. Remember Obama´s "you didn´t build that"? If you become wealthy and have no need for government help, you are now a bad person or a racist. If you believe in god or are religious you are a bad person, but killing babies and working to take the word "god" out of the dollar bill or The Pledge of Allegiance is ok. I find consolation in the fact that a lot of American are now waking up.""

""Cruz is the stronger. He polls higher with Obama opposition and was even elected with 40% of the hispanic vote as he is stronger to the core principled voters and many legal working hispanics have no tolorance to those who would reward lawbreakers with entitlements and citizenship, in either order.""

""Offer citizenship to 11 million illegals is outrageous. They are criminals. Amnesty is an insult to my entire family and the millions of others that followed the rules, waited in line, and legally walked thru the process. Do the right thing! Send ALL illegals back to their native country and have them work the process like all the honest people did.""

Republikanerne var vel mere optaget af at bevare status quo på våbenlovgningen, så kernevælgeren fortsat har automatvåben at skyde efter bilvrag med i baghaven.

If you believe in god or are religious you are a bad person, but killing babies and working to take the word "god" out of the dollar bill or The Pledge of Allegiance is ok.

De fleste hispanics, ulovlige eller ej, er vel enige med forfatteren der.. ikke at det nogensinde ville få dem til at stemme på GOP i stort tal.

Mr Chris Matthews på slap line :-)

""MSNBC host Chris Matthews was unhappy with President Barack Obama´s performance in Germany on Wednesday, claiming his big speech fell a little flat.

Some believe the president´s address lacked its usual theatrical "oomph" because he read from prepared notes instead of his usual teleprompter.

And why did the president use notes instead of the teleprompter?

Matthews believes the sun is to blame. Yes, the president was forced to read from prepared notes because his teleprompters were catching the sun´s glare -- and in the process "ruined" everything for the president.

"I think a lot of the problem he had today was the late afternoon sun in Berlin ruined his use of the teleprompter and so his usual dramatic windup was ruined," Matthews said after the speech.

"I think he was really struggling with the text there."

Samfundsindsigt er ikke lige Huffs stærke side. Det er forvrænget retorik til gengæld. Håber og tror den menige Rep er klogere.

Hov, så lige jeg glemte at smide linket til Mr Fineman´s "artikel"

Beklager, her er den.

http://www.huffingtonpos…462029.html

Hvad Joe Biden har udtalt har vel ikke meget at goere med hvorvidt du synes man kan sige regeringen er ligesom slaveejere, saa hvorfor besvarer du ikke bare spoergsmaalet. Mener du det er forsvarligt?

Og jeg kan ikke komme i tanke om en eneste person som forsvarede Joe Bide, forstaaeligt nok.